From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Seaya

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 3, 1996
228 A.D.2d 455 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)

Opinion

June 3, 1996

Appeal from the County Court, Orange County (Pano Z. Patsalos, J.).


Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Under the totality of the circumstances, the defendant was not denied meaningful representation by counsel ( see, People v Baldi, 54 N.Y.2d 137; People v. Castro, 211 A.D.2d 806; People v Hayes, 186 A.D.2d 268). The defendant's sentence was neither harsh nor excessive ( see, People v. Suitte, 90 A.D.2d 80).

The defendant's remaining contentions are unpreserved for appellate review or without merit. Miller, J.P., Ritter, Krausman and McGinity, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Seaya

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 3, 1996
228 A.D.2d 455 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)
Case details for

People v. Seaya

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. CALVIN SEAYA, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jun 3, 1996

Citations

228 A.D.2d 455 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)
643 N.Y.S.2d 410