From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Sears

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jul 26, 2004
9 A.D.3d 472 (N.Y. App. Div. 2004)

Opinion

2001-07597.

July 26, 2004.

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Richmond County (Rooney, J.), rendered August 16, 2001, convicting him of criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree and criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence. The appeal brings up for review the denial (Rienzi, J.), after a hearing, of that branch of the defendant's omnibus motion which was to suppress his statements to law enforcement authorities.

Before: Santucci, J.P., Schmidt, Townes and Rivera, JJ., concur.


Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant made certain statements to a particular detective who, in effect, delayed his arraignment in order to be able to question him before his right to counsel attached ( cf. People v. Samuels, 49 NY2d 218). The defendant contends that this rendered his statements involuntary. However, his contention is unpreserved for appellate review ( see CPL 470.05). In any event, his contention is without merit, as the totality of the circumstances shows that his statements were voluntarily made ( see People v. Ramos, 99 NY2d 27).

The sentence imposed was not excessive ( see People v. Suitte, 90 AD2d 80).

The defendant's remaining contentions, raised in his supplemental pro se brief, either are unpreserved for appellate review ( see CPL 470.05), or without merit.


Summaries of

People v. Sears

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jul 26, 2004
9 A.D.3d 472 (N.Y. App. Div. 2004)
Case details for

People v. Sears

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. ALLAH SEARS, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jul 26, 2004

Citations

9 A.D.3d 472 (N.Y. App. Div. 2004)
780 N.Y.S.2d 178

Citing Cases

People v. Wilhelm

[internal quotation marks and citations omitted]; see People v Sturdivant, 277 AD2d 607, 608, lv denied 95…

People v. Sears

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.Under the circumstances of this case, including the defendant's…