Opinion
February 2, 1987
Appeal from the Supreme Court, Kings County (Goldstein, J.).
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The court properly instructed the jury that it could consider the complainant's prior description of her assailant (see, People v. Daniels, 88 A.D.2d 392, 402, n).
The defendant's remaining contentions have not been preserved, and we see no reason to exercise our interest of justice jurisdiction in order to reach them. Thompson, J.P., Bracken, Brown and Eiber, JJ., concur.