From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Scott

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
May 28, 1993
193 A.D.2d 1145 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)

Opinion

May 28, 1993

Present — Callahan, J.P., Balio, Lawton, Boomer and Davis, JJ. (Filed May 24, 1993.)


Motion for change of venue denied. Memorandum: We conclude that defendant has not, on this application, met his burden of demonstrating that there is "reasonable cause to believe that a fair and impartial trial cannot be had" in Onondaga County (CPL 230.20). If it develops during the voir dire that a fair and impartial jury cannot be drawn, an appropriate application may then be made. The relief requested in the application before us now is premature (see, People v DiPiazza, 24 N.Y.2d 342; People v Jacobsen, 170 A.D.2d 1043). Furthermore, pursuant to section 701 County of the County Law, we do not have the authority to appoint a special prosecutor.


Summaries of

People v. Scott

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
May 28, 1993
193 A.D.2d 1145 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)
Case details for

People v. Scott

Case Details

Full title:PEOPLE v. ROGER SCOTT, Defendant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: May 28, 1993

Citations

193 A.D.2d 1145 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)
600 N.Y.S.2d 647

Citing Cases

People v. Scott

Motion for change of venue denied. Memorandum: We conclude that defendant has not on this application met his…