Opinion
October 5, 1998
Appeal from the Supreme Court, Richmond County (Kuffner, J.).
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
Prior to jury selection, the trial court ruled that the People would not be permitted to elicit testimony from their witness that she recognized the defendant at the time of the crime because she had previously bought drugs from him. Following jury selection, the court reversed its ruling stating that it would allow the People to introduce such testimony, but denied the defendant's application to reopen voir dire.
The court properly ruled that the witness could testify as to the basis for her identification of the defendant ( see, People v. Branch, 191 A.D.2d 576, affd 83 N.Y.2d 663). Moreover, the court's decision to deny the defendant's request to reopen voir dire was within its discretion ( see, United States v. Reza, 104 F.3d 360; United States v. Abraham, 541 F.2d 1234, 1240, cert denied 429 U.S. 1102).
The defendant's remaining contentions are either unpreserved for appellate review or without merit.
Mangano, P. J., Rosenblatt, Ritter and Altman, JJ., concur.