From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Schultz

Supreme Court of Michigan.
Mar 31, 2017
500 Mich. 955 (Mich. 2017)

Opinion

SC: 151824 COA: 325174

03-31-2017

PEOPLE of the State of Michigan, Plaintiff–Appellee, v. Conrad Robert SCHULTZ, Defendant–Appellant.


Order

On order of the Court, the motion to remand and the application for leave to appeal the May 4, 2015 order of the Court of Appeals are considered. The motion to remand is GRANTED in part. Pursuant to MCR 7.305(H)(1), in lieu of granting leave to appeal, we VACATE that part of the November 25, 2014 judgment of the Wayne Circuit Court addressing the defendant's claim of ineffective assistance of counsel. We REMAND this case to the Wayne Circuit Court for an evidentiary hearing pursuant to People v. Ginther, 390 Mich. 436 (1973), to determine whether the defendant was deprived of his right to the effective assistance of counsel based on the assertions made in the affidavit of Keeley Heath, the second chair at the defendant's trial, regarding the performance of the defendant's lead counsel. In all other respects, leave to appeal is DENIED, because the defendant has failed to meet the burden of establishing entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D).

We do not retain jurisdiction.


Summaries of

People v. Schultz

Supreme Court of Michigan.
Mar 31, 2017
500 Mich. 955 (Mich. 2017)
Case details for

People v. Schultz

Case Details

Full title:PEOPLE of the State of Michigan, Plaintiff–Appellee, v. Conrad Robert…

Court:Supreme Court of Michigan.

Date published: Mar 31, 2017

Citations

500 Mich. 955 (Mich. 2017)
891 N.W.2d 476

Citing Cases

Schultz v. Campbell

In all other respects, leave to appeal is DENIED, because the defendant has failed to meet the burden of…