From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Schriro

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Oct 11, 2011
88 A.D.3d 824 (N.Y. App. Div. 2011)

Opinion

2011-10-11

The PEOPLE, etc., ex rel. Robert DiDIO, on behalf of Elijah FOSTER–BEY, petitioner,v.Dora B. SCHRIRO, etc., respondent.


Robert DiDio, Kew Gardens, New York, petitioner pro se.Charles J. Hynes, District Attorney, Brooklyn, New York (Lewis E. Lieberman of counsel), for respondent.

Writ of habeas corpus in the nature of an application for bail upon Kings County Indictment No. 9239/10.

ADJUDGED that the writ is dismissed, without costs or disbursements.

The determination of the Supreme Court, Kings County, was not an improvident exercise of discretion, and did not violate “constitutional or statutory standards” ( People ex rel. Klein v. Krueger, 25 N.Y.2d 497, 499, 307 N.Y.S.2d 207, 255 N.E.2d 552; see People ex rel. Rosenthal v. Wolfson, 48 N.Y.2d 230, 422 N.Y.S.2d 55, 397 N.E.2d 745).

RIVERA, J.P., FLORIO, DICKERSON and LOTT, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Schriro

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Oct 11, 2011
88 A.D.3d 824 (N.Y. App. Div. 2011)
Case details for

People v. Schriro

Case Details

Full title:The PEOPLE, etc., ex rel. Robert DiDIO, on behalf of Elijah FOSTER–BEY…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.

Date published: Oct 11, 2011

Citations

88 A.D.3d 824 (N.Y. App. Div. 2011)
2011 N.Y. Slip Op. 7249
930 N.Y.S.2d 889