From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Schraenkler

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Nov 15, 1995
221 A.D.2d 1003 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)

Opinion

November 15, 1995

Appeal from the Wayne County Court, Parenti, J.

Present — Denman, P.J., Green, Fallon, Balio and Boehm, JJ.


Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: The motion to suppress defendant's statement to the police was properly denied. The record supports County Court's determinations that defendant was not in custody prior to receiving Miranda warnings (see, People v Flecha, 195 A.D.2d 1052; People v Forbes, 182 A.D.2d 829, lv denied 80 N.Y.2d 895) and that the ruse employed by the police during the questioning of defendant did not render his statement involuntary (see, People v Robinson, 201 A.D.2d 931, lv denied 83 N.Y.2d 875).


Summaries of

People v. Schraenkler

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Nov 15, 1995
221 A.D.2d 1003 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)
Case details for

People v. Schraenkler

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. LARRY R. SCHRAENKLER…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Nov 15, 1995

Citations

221 A.D.2d 1003 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)
635 N.Y.S.2d 559

Citing Cases

People v. Sachs

Defendant failed to preserve for our review his contentions that the People's medical expert improperly…

People v. Manzi

County Court properly refused to suppress two written statements that defendant gave to the police. Contrary…