From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Schorr

County Court, Chautauqua County
Dec 1, 1924
124 Misc. 64 (N.Y. Misc. 1924)

Opinion

December ____, 1924.

Glenn D. Woodin, District Attorney, for the People.

Thomas H. Larkin, for the defendant.


The petitioner, Clem Schoor, presents his petition to the County Court, Chautauqua county, seeking the refund of fifty dollars in money and a fifty-dollar Liberty bond, deposited in the Municipal Court of the city of Dunkirk as bail for his appearance in said court upon an adjourned day.

The Municipal Court of the city of Dunkirk has entered an order forfeiting said fifty dollars and said Liberty bond for the failure of the petitioner to appear as required by the order. It appears from the petition that an effort was made by the petitioner to recover the possession of said money and Liberty bond from the judge of the Municipal Court. While this effort appears to have been informal in character, it appears that the judge of said court refused to return said money to the petitioner. Under these circumstances the County Court, under section 597 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, has concurrent jurisdiction with the Municipal Court in a proceeding to remit said moneys and under the authority of People v. Street (14 N.Y.S. 778) this court will not interfere with the jurisdiction of the Municipal Court of the city of Dunkirk. An application should be made to the Municipal Court of the city of Dunkirk for a rehearing, if the petitioner desires a rehearing of the matter.


Summaries of

People v. Schorr

County Court, Chautauqua County
Dec 1, 1924
124 Misc. 64 (N.Y. Misc. 1924)
Case details for

People v. Schorr

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Plaintiff, v . CLEM SCHORR, Defendant

Court:County Court, Chautauqua County

Date published: Dec 1, 1924

Citations

124 Misc. 64 (N.Y. Misc. 1924)
207 N.Y.S. 549

Citing Cases

People v. Sheehy

The motion of the surety to remit the forfeiture heretofore declared herein is therefore granted. This court…

People v. Sheehy

The motion of the surety to remit the forfeiture heretofore declared herein is therefore granted. This court…