From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Schmidt

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, Second Department
Jun 16, 1970
63 Misc. 2d 665 (N.Y. App. Term 1970)

Opinion

June 16, 1970

Appeal from the Nassau County District Court, EDWARD POULOS, J., BENJAMIN ZIPPER, J.

James J. McDonough and Matthew Muraskin for appellant.

William Cahn, District Attorney ( Raymond G. Lavallee of counsel), for respondent.


It was improper for the People to call defendant as a witness against himself at the narcotic addiction hearing. The privilege against self incrimination can be claimed in any proceeding, whether criminal or civil, administrative or judicial, investigatory or adjudicatory ( Matter of Gault, 387 U.S. 1, 47-48; People v. Martin, N.Y.L.J., Feb. 19, 1970, p. 14, col. 4).

The judgment of conviction should be unanimously modified on the law by vacating sentence certifying defendant to the Narcotic Addiction Control Commission, and case remanded to the District Court of Nassau County for a new trial on the issue of whether defendant is a narcotic addict, and for such further proceedings as may be appropriate; as so modified, judgment of conviction affirmed.

Concur — HOGAN, P.J., GLICKMAN and PITTONI, JJ.

Judgment modified, etc.


Summaries of

People v. Schmidt

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, Second Department
Jun 16, 1970
63 Misc. 2d 665 (N.Y. App. Term 1970)
Case details for

People v. Schmidt

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. RONALD A. SCHMIDT…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Term, Second Department

Date published: Jun 16, 1970

Citations

63 Misc. 2d 665 (N.Y. App. Term 1970)
313 N.Y.S.2d 135