From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Schiff

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Apr 25, 2013
105 A.D.3d 1290 (N.Y. App. Div. 2013)

Opinion

2013-04-25

The PEOPLE of the State of New York ex rel. Matthew WIGGINS, Appellant, v. Michael SCHIFF, as Sullivan County Sheriff, Respondent.

Matthew Wiggins, Monticello, appellant pro se. Samuel S. Yasgur, County Attorney, Monticello (Thomas J. Cawley of counsel), for respondent.


Matthew Wiggins, Monticello, appellant pro se. Samuel S. Yasgur, County Attorney, Monticello (Thomas J. Cawley of counsel), for respondent.
Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, Albany (Frank Brady of counsel), for New York State Department of Corrections and Community Supervision.

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court (LaBuda, J.), entered June 26, 2012 in Sullivan County, which dismissed petitioner's application, in a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 70, without a hearing.

Petitioner was sentenced to a term of imprisonment and postrelease supervision as the result of a 2008 conviction, and he was released to parole supervision in 2011. He was taken into custody approximately five months later for violating the terms of his parole in various respects—most notably by possessing heroin—and allegedly waived a preliminary revocation hearing. An indictment followed, charging petitioner with one count of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the fourth degree. He then brought this application for a writ of habeas corpus, alleging that he had been impermissibly deprived of a preliminary hearing. Supreme Court dismissed the application without a hearing, and this appeal ensued.

We affirm. Regardless of the merits of petitioner's claim that he was deprived of a preliminary hearing, an independent basis for his parole revocation exists given his conviction upon the count charged in the indictment ( seeExecutive Law § 259–i[3][d][iii]; People ex rel. Strauss v. New York State Div. of Parole, 55 A.D.3d 1198, 1199, 867 N.Y.S.2d 223 [2008],lv. denied12 N.Y.3d 702, 876 N.Y.S.2d 349, 904 N.E.2d 504 [2009] ). Petitioner is thus not entitled to immediate release, rendering habeas corpus relief unavailable ( see People ex rel. Brown v. New York State Div. of Parole, 70 N.Y.2d 391, 398, 521 N.Y.S.2d 657, 516 N.E.2d 194 [1987];People ex rel. Strauss v. New York State Div. of Parole, 55 A.D.3d at 1199, 867 N.Y.S.2d 223).

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed, without costs.

MERCURE, J.P., ROSE, GARRY and EGAN JR., JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Schiff

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Apr 25, 2013
105 A.D.3d 1290 (N.Y. App. Div. 2013)
Case details for

People v. Schiff

Case Details

Full title:The PEOPLE of the State of New York ex rel. Matthew WIGGINS, Appellant, v…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.

Date published: Apr 25, 2013

Citations

105 A.D.3d 1290 (N.Y. App. Div. 2013)
963 N.Y.S.2d 610
2013 N.Y. Slip Op. 2802