From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Schena

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Feb 6, 2009
59 A.D.3d 986 (N.Y. App. Div. 2009)

Opinion

No. KA 08-00687.

February 6, 2009.

Appeal from a judgment of the Genesee County Court (Robert C. Noonan, J.), rendered January 3, 2008. The judgment convicted defendant, upon her plea of guilty, of driving while intoxicated, a class E felony.

GARY A. HORTON, PUBLIC DEFENDER, BATAVIA (BRIDGET L. FIELD OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

LAWRENCE FRIEDMAN, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, BATAVIA (KEVIN T. FINNELL OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT.

Present: Scudder, P.J., Hurlbutt, Peradotto and Gorski, JJ.


It is hereby ordered that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously affirmed.

Memorandum: Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting her upon her plea of guilty of driving while intoxicated as a felony (Vehicle and Traffic Law § 1192; § 1193 [1] [c] [former (i)]). We note that the certificate of conviction incorrectly recites that a fine of $1,500 was imposed on the conviction, and it must therefore be amended to reflect that the fine imposed was $1,050 ( see generally People v Saxton, 32 AD3d 1286). We reject defendant's contention that the fine imposed is unduly harsh or severe.


Summaries of

People v. Schena

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Feb 6, 2009
59 A.D.3d 986 (N.Y. App. Div. 2009)
Case details for

People v. Schena

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. DEBORAH K. SCHENA…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Feb 6, 2009

Citations

59 A.D.3d 986 (N.Y. App. Div. 2009)
2009 N.Y. Slip Op. 830
872 N.Y.S.2d 316

Citing Cases

People v. Vanderhoef

Nevertheless, we conclude that the sentence is not unduly harsh or severe. We likewise reject defendant's…

People v. Vanderhoef

We likewise reject defendant's contention in appeal Nos. 1 and 3, respectively, that the imposition of a…