From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Sceravino

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 2, 2008
57 A.D.3d 503 (N.Y. App. Div. 2008)

Opinion

No. 2007-02994.

December 2, 2008.

Appeal by the defendant from an order of the County Court, Suffolk County (J. Doyle, J.), dated March 12, 2007, which, upon his consent, designated him a level two sex offender pursuant to Correction Law article 6-C.

Salvatore C. Adamo, Patchogue, N.Y., for appellant.

Thomas J. Spota, District Attorney, Riverhead, N.Y. (Edward A. Bannan of counsel), for respondent.

Before: Mastro, J.P., Rivera, Fisher and Eng, JJ. concur.


Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

Contrary to the defendant's contention, the record contains nothing to warrant the conclusion that he was deprived of his constitutional right to the effective assistance of counsel, which resulted in his consenting to a level two sex offender designation ( see generally People v Carey, 47 AD3d 1079; see also People v Costas, 46 AD3d 475).


Summaries of

People v. Sceravino

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 2, 2008
57 A.D.3d 503 (N.Y. App. Div. 2008)
Case details for

People v. Sceravino

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. KEVIN SCERAVINO…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Dec 2, 2008

Citations

57 A.D.3d 503 (N.Y. App. Div. 2008)
2008 N.Y. Slip Op. 9575
867 N.Y.S.2d 696

Citing Cases

People v. Kinlock

Contrary to the defendant's contention, defense counsel was not ineffective for failing to contest the…

People of State v. Bowles

e restrictive than that guaranteed by the Sixth Amendment to the United States Constitution” ( People v.…