From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Scarola

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Sep 24, 1992
186 A.D.2d 78 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)

Opinion

September 24, 1992

Appeal from the Supreme Court, New York County (Alvin Schlesinger, J.).


There is no merit to defendant's argument that his sentence must be reduced under Penal Law § 70.30 (1) (c), which provides that the aggregate maximum terms of consecutive sentences imposed for two or more crimes, one of which was a class B felony, cannot exceed 30 years. An aggregate sentence that exceeds the statutory limit is not illegal, but is simply to be "deemed" equal to the limitation by the Department of Correctional Services (People v Moore, 61 N.Y.2d 575, 578; People v Byas, 173 A.D.2d 314, 315, lv denied 78 N.Y.2d 1126).

We have considered defendant's other argument that the sentence imposed is unduly harsh, and find it to be without merit (see, People v Felman, 141 A.D.2d 889, 890, lv denied 72 N.Y.2d 918).

Concur — Wallach, J.P., Kupferman, Asch and Rubin, JJ.


Summaries of

People v. Scarola

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Sep 24, 1992
186 A.D.2d 78 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)
Case details for

People v. Scarola

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. MICHAEL SCAROLA…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Sep 24, 1992

Citations

186 A.D.2d 78 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)
587 N.Y.S.2d 656

Citing Cases

Scarola v. Kelly

Appellate Division agreed with petitioner that his 33 year maximum term of, imprisonment violated §…

People v. Phillips

The record fails to support defendant's claim that his actions were the product of his purported inability to…