From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Scalegnio

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
May 7, 1964
199 N.E.2d 509 (N.Y. 1964)

Opinion

Submitted April 1, 1964

Decided May 7, 1964

Appeal from the Supreme Court in the Second Judicial Department, RICHARD F. DALY, J.

P. Emmett Toner for appellant.

John M. Braisted, Jr., District Attorney ( Thomas R. Sullivan of counsel), for respondent.


Order of Appellate Term reversed and motion to suppress granted (see People v. Caliente, 12 N.Y.2d 89).

Concur: Chief Judge DESMOND and Judges FULD, VAN VOORHIS, BURKE, SCILEPPI and BERGAN.


When we take into consideration that, shortly before the officer lawfully stopped defendant's automobile for a traffic violation, he had observed defendant make contact with a known drug pusher under suspicious circumstances, it was not unreasonable for the officer to believe that defendant was committing the crime of possession of narcotics in his presence. This being so, probable cause existed for the arrest of defendant without a warrant and the officer was justified in seizing what appeared to be a package of marijuana lying in plain sight in the automobile.


Summaries of

People v. Scalegnio

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
May 7, 1964
199 N.E.2d 509 (N.Y. 1964)
Case details for

People v. Scalegnio

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. FRANK SCALEGNIO…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: May 7, 1964

Citations

199 N.E.2d 509 (N.Y. 1964)
199 N.E.2d 509
250 N.Y.S.2d 429

Citing Cases

People v. Vasquez

At the time the patrolman saw the two packets he did not know what the envelopes contained and there was…

People v. Roach

( Stoner v. California, 376 U.S. 483; Preston v. United States, 376 U.S. 364; Jones v. United States, 357…