From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Savinan

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Feb 17, 2009
59 A.D.3d 247 (N.Y. App. Div. 2009)

Opinion

No. 5252.

February 17, 2009.

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (William A. Wetzel, J.), entered on or about August 6, 2007, which denied defendant's motion to be resentenced pursuant to the 2005 Drug Law Reform Act, unanimously affirmed.

Richard M. Greenberg, Office of the Appellate Defender, New York (Alexandra Keeling of counsel), for appellant.

Robert M. Morgenthau, District Attorney, New York (Marc Krupnick of counsel), for respondent.

Before: Friedman, J.P., Gonzalez, Buckley and Renwick, JJ.


The court properly recognized the degree of discretion it possessed ( compare People v Arana, 32 AD3d 305), and providently exercised its discretion when it determined that substantial justice dictated denial of defendant's resentencing application. The magnitude of defendant's involvement in drug trafficking outweighed his favorable prison record ( see e.g. People v Rizo, 51 AD3d 436; People v Arana, 45 AD3d 311, lv dismissed 9 NY3d 1031).

We have considered and rejected defendant's remaining arguments.


Summaries of

People v. Savinan

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Feb 17, 2009
59 A.D.3d 247 (N.Y. App. Div. 2009)
Case details for

People v. Savinan

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. JOSE SAVINAN, Also…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Feb 17, 2009

Citations

59 A.D.3d 247 (N.Y. App. Div. 2009)
2009 N.Y. Slip Op. 1177
873 N.Y.S.2d 562

Citing Cases

People v. Brown

We conclude that Supreme Court properly denied the application for resentencing because defendant, at the…

People v. Brown

We conclude that Supreme Court properly denied the application for resentencing because defendant, at the…