From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Saunders

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 2, 1995
220 A.D.2d 466 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)

Opinion

October 2, 1995

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Queens County (Fisher, J.).


Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant has failed to preserve for appellate review his contention that he was prejudiced by the prosecutor's improper comments during summation (see, CPL 470.05; People v Balls, 69 N.Y.2d 641; People v. Nuccie, 57 N.Y.2d 818), and we decline to reach the issue in the exercise of our interest of justice jurisdiction.

The defendant's sentence is neither harsh nor excessive under the circumstances of this case (see, People v. Suitte, 90 A.D.2d 80). Mangano, P.J., Bracken, Balletta and Hart, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Saunders

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 2, 1995
220 A.D.2d 466 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)
Case details for

People v. Saunders

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. ROBERT SAUNDERS…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Oct 2, 1995

Citations

220 A.D.2d 466 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)
632 N.Y.S.2d 476