From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Sargeant

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 5, 1997
239 A.D.2d 444 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)

Opinion

May 5, 1997

Application for a writ of error coram nobis.


Ordered that the application is granted, and the decision and order of this Court, dated June 24, 1991 is vacated; and it is further,

Ordered that the judgment is reversed, on the law, and a new trial is ordered.

The appellant correctly contends that the trial court committed reversible error in discharging a sworn juror during trial approximately one hour after that juror failed to appear. The court made no attempt to ascertain the location of the juror and did not conduct any inquiry into the reason for the juror's absence (see, CPL 270.35; People v. Page, 72 N.Y.2d 69; People v. Barker, 183 A.D.2d 835; People v. Rodriguez, 166 A.D.2d 618). This error is not subject to harmless error analysis (see, People v. Anderson, 70 N.Y.2d 729; People v. Polhill, 140 A.D.2d 462). Furthermore, contrary to the People's contention, this issue was adequately preserved for appellate review by the timely and specific objection of the appellant's trial counsel (see, People v. Barker, supra; People v. Battle, 167 A.D.2d 190). Accordingly, the appellant is entitled to a new trial.

Bracken, J. P., Ritter, Sullivan and Pizzuto, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Sargeant

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 5, 1997
239 A.D.2d 444 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)
Case details for

People v. Sargeant

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. DAVID SARGEANT…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: May 5, 1997

Citations

239 A.D.2d 444 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)
657 N.Y.S.2d 753

Citing Cases

People v. Watts

County Court was certainly not required to wait two hours before substituting juror No. 1, but, on the record…

People v. Colter

The record discloses that, prior to discharging juror No. 1, the court neither heard from nor reached out to…