From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Sapp

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department, New York.
Nov 10, 2022
210 A.D.3d 1431 (N.Y. App. Div. 2022)

Opinion

782 KA 21-00609

11-10-2022

The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Freddy L. SAPP, Defendant-Appellant.

LEANNE LAPP, PUBLIC DEFENDER, CANANDAIGUA (BRADLEY E. KEEM OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. JAMES B. RITTS, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, CANANDAIGUA (V. CHRISTOPHER EAGGLESTON OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT.


LEANNE LAPP, PUBLIC DEFENDER, CANANDAIGUA (BRADLEY E. KEEM OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

JAMES B. RITTS, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, CANANDAIGUA (V. CHRISTOPHER EAGGLESTON OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT.

PRESENT: LINDLEY, J.P., NEMOYER, WINSLOW, BANNISTER, AND MONTOUR, JJ.

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously affirmed.

Memorandum: Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him upon his plea of guilty of assault in the second degree ( Penal Law § 120.05 [1] ). We reject defendant's contention that he did not validly waive the right to appeal. Contrary to defendant's contention, County Court's colloquy established that the right to appeal was "separate and distinct" from those rights automatically forfeited by pleading guilty ( People v. Lopez , 6 N.Y.3d 248, 256, 811 N.Y.S.2d 623, 844 N.E.2d 1145 [2006] ; see People v. Cromie , 187 A.D.3d 1659, 1659, 133 N.Y.S.3d 167 [4th Dept. 2020], lv denied 36 N.Y.3d 971, 138 N.Y.S.3d 488, 162 N.E.3d 717 [2020] ) and did not "utterly mischaracterize[ ] the nature of the right ... defendant was being asked to cede" ( People v. Thomas , 34 N.Y.3d 545, 565, 122 N.Y.S.3d 226, 144 N.E.3d 970 [2019], cert denied ––– U.S. ––––, 140 S. Ct. 2634, 206 L.Ed.2d 512 [2020] [internal quotation marks omitted]; see Cromie , 187 A.D.3d at 1659, 133 N.Y.S.3d 167 ). Defendant's valid waiver of the right to appeal encompasses his challenge to the severity of the sentence (see Lopez , 6 N.Y.3d at 255-256, 811 N.Y.S.2d 623, 844 N.E.2d 1145 ; Cromie , 187 A.D.3d at 1660, 133 N.Y.S.3d 167 ).

Although defendant's further contention that his plea was not knowingly, voluntarily, and intelligently entered survives his valid waiver of the right to appeal (see People v. Woods , 126 A.D.3d 1543, 1543, 6 N.Y.S.3d 857 [4th Dept. 2015], lv denied 27 N.Y.3d 970, 36 N.Y.S.3d 631, 56 N.E.3d 911 [2016] ), defendant failed to preserve that contention for our review by moving to withdraw his plea or to vacate the judgment of conviction (see People v. Guantero , 100 A.D.3d 1386, 1387, 953 N.Y.S.2d 438 [4th Dept. 2012], lv denied 21 N.Y.3d 1004, 971 N.Y.S.2d 256, 993 N.E.2d 1278 [2013] ).


Summaries of

People v. Sapp

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department, New York.
Nov 10, 2022
210 A.D.3d 1431 (N.Y. App. Div. 2022)
Case details for

People v. Sapp

Case Details

Full title:The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Freddy L. SAPP…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department, New York.

Date published: Nov 10, 2022

Citations

210 A.D.3d 1431 (N.Y. App. Div. 2022)
176 N.Y.S.3d 525

Citing Cases

People v. Shaw

In his main brief, defendant contends that his plea to manslaughter in the first degree was not voluntarily,…

People v. Shaw

In his main brief, defendant contends that his plea to manslaughter in the first degree was not voluntarily,…