From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Santilli

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Mar 18, 2005
16 A.D.3d 1056 (N.Y. App. Div. 2005)

Opinion

KA 04-00180.

March 18, 2005.

Appeal from a judgment of the Seneca County Court (Dennis F. Bender, J.), rendered October 7, 2003. The judgment convicted defendant, upon her plea of guilty, of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the second degree.

Before: Pigott, Jr., P.J., Hurlbutt, Gorski, Pine and Hayes, JJ.


It is hereby ordered that the judgment so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed.

Memorandum: On appeal from a judgment convicting her of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the second degree (Penal Law § 220.18), defendant contends that the sentence of incarceration of 3½ years to life constitutes cruel and unusual punishment. We conclude that the contention of defendant does not survive her valid waiver of the right to appeal ( see People v. Hidalgo, 283 AD2d 154, lv denied 96 NY2d 902; People v. Brathwaite, 263 AD2d 89, 92) and, in any event, that contention is not preserved for our review ( see People v. Ingram, 67 NY2d 897, 899; People v. Cato, 291 AD2d 905, lv denied 98 NY2d 649).


Summaries of

People v. Santilli

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Mar 18, 2005
16 A.D.3d 1056 (N.Y. App. Div. 2005)
Case details for

People v. Santilli

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. LORRIE SANTILLI…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Mar 18, 2005

Citations

16 A.D.3d 1056 (N.Y. App. Div. 2005)
790 N.Y.S.2d 898

Citing Cases

People v. Warner

Contrary to defendant's contention, County Court "did not improperly conflate the waiver of the right to…

People v. Vega

In addition, the waiver encompasses the contention of defendant that the Rockefeller Drug Law Reform Act…