From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Santiago

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
May 17, 2016
139 A.D.3d 515 (N.Y. App. Div. 2016)

Opinion

1163 2392/13

05-17-2016

The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Melvin Santiago, Defendant-Appellant.

Seymour W. James, Jr., The Legal Aid Society, New York (Eve Kessler of counsel), for appellant. Darcel D. Clark, District Attorney, Bronx (James Wen of counsel), for respondent.


Seymour W. James, Jr., The Legal Aid Society, New York (Eve Kessler of counsel), for appellant.

Darcel D. Clark, District Attorney, Bronx (James Wen of counsel), for respondent.

Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (John W. Carter, J.), rendered October 24, 2014, convicting defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of course of sexual conduct against a child in the first degree, and sentencing him to a term of 5 years, with 15 years' postrelease supervision, unanimously affirmed.

The sentencing court had no discretion to waive or defer defendant's mandatory surcharge (see People v Jones, 26 NY3d 730, 732 [2016]).

Defendant did not make a valid waiver of his right to appeal, because the court stated that the waiver was in exchange for receiving the "minimum sentence," when in fact, the term of postrelease supervision was greater than the minimum. However, we perceive no basis for reducing the term.

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.

ENTERED: MAY 17, 2016

CLERK


Summaries of

People v. Santiago

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
May 17, 2016
139 A.D.3d 515 (N.Y. App. Div. 2016)
Case details for

People v. Santiago

Case Details

Full title:The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Melvin Santiago…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.

Date published: May 17, 2016

Citations

139 A.D.3d 515 (N.Y. App. Div. 2016)
2016 N.Y. Slip Op. 3831
30 N.Y.S.3d 544

Citing Cases

People v. Tookes

In each case the First Department held that: “The sentencing court properly found that it had no discretion…

People v. Ackwood

Under the circumstances of this case, the defendant's purported waiver of his right to appeal was invalid…