From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Santiago

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Sep 25, 2013
109 A.D.3d 1009 (N.Y. App. Div. 2013)

Opinion

2013-09-25

The PEOPLE, etc., respondent, v. Cheryl A. SANTIAGO, appellant.

Malvina Nathanson, New York, N.Y., for appellant. William V. Grady, District Attorney, Poughkeepsie, N.Y. (Kirsten A. Rappleyea of counsel), for respondent.


Malvina Nathanson, New York, N.Y., for appellant. William V. Grady, District Attorney, Poughkeepsie, N.Y. (Kirsten A. Rappleyea of counsel), for respondent.

Appeal by the defendant, as limited by her motion, from a resentence of the County Court, Dutchess County (Greller, J.), imposed December 12, 2012, upon remittitur from this Court ( see People v. Santiago, 97 A.D.3d 704, 949 N.Y.S.2d 78,lv. granted 20 N.Y.3d 935, 957 N.Y.S.2d 695, 981 N.E.2d 292), on the ground that the resentence was excessive.

ORDERED that the resentence is affirmed.

Contrary to the defendant's contention, the resentence imposed was not excessive ( see People v. Suitte, 90 A.D.2d 80, 455 N.Y.S.2d 675).

ENG, P.J., ANGIOLILLO, BALKIN and HALL, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Santiago

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Sep 25, 2013
109 A.D.3d 1009 (N.Y. App. Div. 2013)
Case details for

People v. Santiago

Case Details

Full title:The PEOPLE, etc., respondent, v. Cheryl A. SANTIAGO, appellant.

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.

Date published: Sep 25, 2013

Citations

109 A.D.3d 1009 (N.Y. App. Div. 2013)
2013 N.Y. Slip Op. 6029
971 N.Y.S.2d 474