From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Santiago

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Nov 21, 2003
1 A.D.3d 957 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)

Opinion

KA 02-01344.

November 21, 2003.

Appeal from a judgment of Supreme Court, Monroe County (Fisher, J.), entered March 7, 2002, convicting defendant upon his plea of guilty of, inter alia, robbery in the first degree.

Edward J. Nowak, Public Defender, Rochester (Shirley A. Gorman of Counsel), for Defendant-Appellant.

Howard R. Relin, District Attorney, Rochester (Daniel P. Majchrzak, Jr., of Counsel), for Plaintiff-Respondent.

Before: Present: Pigott, Jr., P.J., Pine, Scudder, Gorski, and Lawton, JJ.


MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed.

Memorandum: Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him upon his plea of guilty of robbery in the first degree (Penal Law § 160.15), assault in the second degree (§ 120.05 [6]) and grand larceny in the fourth degree (§ 155.30 [1]). Defendant waived his contention that Supreme Court abused its discretion in failing to grant him youthful offender status ( see People v. McGowen, 42 N.Y.2d 905, rearg denied 42 N.Y.2d 1015). In any event, that contention lacks merit. Defendant received the bargained-for sentence, and thus we reject his further contention that the sentence is unduly harsh or severe ( see People v. Granton, 236 A.D.2d 624, 625, lv denied 89 N.Y.2d 1012).


Summaries of

People v. Santiago

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Nov 21, 2003
1 A.D.3d 957 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)
Case details for

People v. Santiago

Case Details

Full title:PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. EDUVIGE…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Nov 21, 2003

Citations

1 A.D.3d 957 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)
767 N.Y.S.2d 322

Citing Cases

People v. Ponder

We reject those contentions. Defendant has failed to demonstrate that the outcome of the grand jury…

People v. O'Conner

We reject that contention. At no point was defense counsel relieved of his assignment, and defense counsel…