From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Santiago

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 2, 1997
240 A.D.2d 441 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)

Opinion

June 2, 1997

Appeal from the County Court, Suffolk County (Weissman, J.).


Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Having failed to move to withdraw his plea pursuant to CPL 220.60 (3), or to vacate his judgment of conviction pursuant to CPL 440.10, the defendant's challenge to the factual sufficiency of his plea allocution is unpreserved for appellate review (see, People v. Pellegrino, 60 N.Y.2d 636). We reject the defendant's contention that his recitation of the facts underlying the crimes he pleaded to clearly cast significant doubt upon his guilt requiring the court to conduct a further inquiry to ensure that he understood the nature of the charge and that the plea was intelligently entered (cf., People v. Lopez, 71 N.Y.2d 662).

Mangano, P.J., Ritter, Sullivan, Altman and McGinity, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Santiago

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 2, 1997
240 A.D.2d 441 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)
Case details for

People v. Santiago

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. MIGUEL SANTIAGO, JR.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jun 2, 1997

Citations

240 A.D.2d 441 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)
658 N.Y.S.2d 999