From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Santiago

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 2, 2001
282 A.D.2d 479 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)

Opinion

Submitted March 6, 2001.

April 2, 2001.

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Ruchelsman, J.), rendered February 9, 1998, convicting him of burglary in the second degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

M. Sue Wycoff, New York, N.Y. (Jane Levitt of counsel), for appellant.

Charles J. Hynes, District Attorney, Brooklyn, N.Y. (Leonard Joblove and Phyllis Mintz of counsel; Frank J. Macchiarola on the brief), for the respondent.

Before: CORNELIUS J. O'BRIEN, J.P., DAVID S. RITTER, GLORIA GOLDSTEIN, NANCY E. SMITH, JJ.


DECISION ORDER

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.

The objections by the defendant's counsel to references to certain hearsay evidence were sustained, and no requests for curative instructions were made. Accordingly, the Supreme Court "must be deemed to have corrected the error to the defendant's satisfaction" (People v. Campbell, 228 A.D.2d 689).

The defendant's remaining contentions are either unpreserved for appellate review or without merit.


Summaries of

People v. Santiago

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 2, 2001
282 A.D.2d 479 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)
Case details for

People v. Santiago

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE, ETC., RESPONDENT, v. ALEJANDRO SANTIAGO, APPELLANT

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Apr 2, 2001

Citations

282 A.D.2d 479 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)
722 N.Y.S.2d 414

Citing Cases

People v. Santiago

October 1, 2002. Application by the appellant for a writ of error coram nobis to vacate, on the ground of…