From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Santiago

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 26, 2001
280 A.D.2d 688 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)

Opinion

Submitted January 31, 2001

February 26, 2001.

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Ruchelsman, J.), rendered November 15, 1999, convicting her of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the second degree, upon her plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Patrick J. Hayes, Brooklyn, N.Y., for appellant.

Charles J. Hynes, District Attorney, Brooklyn, N.Y. (Leonard Joblove and Florence M. Sullivan of counsel), for respondent.

Before: RITTER, J.P., KRAUSMAN, FLORIO and FEUERSTEIN, JJ., concur.


DECISION ORDER

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant's claims are either unpreserved for appellate review (see, People v. Lopez, 71 N.Y.2d 662) or waived (see, People v. Hayes, 239 A.D.2d 358). In any event, there is nothing in the defendant's factual allocution which casts doubt upon her guilt, negates an essential element of the crime, or suggests a legitimate defense (see, People v. Dozier, 221 A.D.2d 655).


Summaries of

People v. Santiago

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 26, 2001
280 A.D.2d 688 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)
Case details for

People v. Santiago

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE, ETC., RESPONDENT, v. NILDA SANTIAGO, APPELLANT. (Ind. No…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Feb 26, 2001

Citations

280 A.D.2d 688 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)
721 N.Y.S.2d 253

Citing Cases

People v. Diaz

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed. The defendant's challenge to the factual adequacy of his plea…

People v. Curras

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed. The defendant's valid waiver of his right to appeal precludes review…