From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Santana

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Mar 6, 2013
104 A.D.3d 660 (N.Y. App. Div. 2013)

Opinion

2013-03-6

PEOPLE of State of New York, respondent, v. Aristides SANTANA, appellant.

Robert C. Mitchell, Riverhead, N.Y. (James H. Miller III of counsel), for appellant. *322Thomas J. Spota, District Attorney, Riverhead, N.Y. (Michael J. Brennan of counsel), for respondent.


Robert C. Mitchell, Riverhead, N.Y. (James H. Miller III of counsel), for appellant. *322Thomas J. Spota, District Attorney, Riverhead, N.Y. (Michael J. Brennan of counsel), for respondent.

Appeal by the defendant from an order of the County Court, Suffolk County (Kahn, J.), dated March 26, 2012, which, after a hearing, designated him a level three sex offender pursuant to Correction Law article 6–C.

ORDERED that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

Contrary to the defendant's contention, the County Court properly determined that he was not entitled to a downward departure from his presumptive risk level. Thus, he was properly designated a level three sex offender ( see People v. Wyatt, 89 A.D.3d 112, 128–129, 931 N.Y.S.2d 85;People v. Bowden, 88 A.D.3d 972, 973, 931 N.Y.S.2d 640;People v. Mondo, 88 A.D.3d 676, 930 N.Y.S.2d 482;People v. Livingston, 87 A.D.3d 628, 928 N.Y.S.2d 473).

RIVERA, J.P., HALL, ROMAN and MILLER, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Santana

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Mar 6, 2013
104 A.D.3d 660 (N.Y. App. Div. 2013)
Case details for

People v. Santana

Case Details

Full title:PEOPLE of State of New York, respondent, v. Aristides SANTANA, appellant.

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.

Date published: Mar 6, 2013

Citations

104 A.D.3d 660 (N.Y. App. Div. 2013)
2013 N.Y. Slip Op. 1387
960 N.Y.S.2d 321

Citing Cases

People v. Palmer

ORDERED that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements. Contrary to the defendant's contention,…