From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Sanford

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, Second Dept., 9th & 10th Judicial Districts
Feb 19, 2020
2020 N.Y. Slip Op. 63778 (N.Y. App. Term 2020)

Opinion

Motion No: 2020-00134 NCR

02-19-2020

The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Hugh Sanford, Appellant.


BRUCE E. TOLBERT

JERRY GARGUILO, JJ.

DECISION & ORDER ON MOTION

On the court's own motion, it is

ORDERED that this appeal from judgments of conviction of the District Court of Nassau County, Nassau County Traffic and Parking Violations Agency, rendered October 16, 2019, is stricken from the general calendar.

The notice of appeal in this matter is jurisdictionally defective in that it fails to designate the court to which the appeal is taken or the judgments being appealed (see CPLR 5515 [1]; Matter of Long Is. Pine Barrens Socy., Inc v Central Pine Barrens Joint Planning & Policy Commn., 113 AD3d 854 [2014]). Appellant's remedy, if he be so advised, is to move in the Traffic and Parking Violations Agency to amend the notice of appeal to state that the appeal is taken to the Appellate Term for the Ninth and Tenth Judicial Districts, and specifically identify the judgments being appealed. The notice of appeal must be re-served and filed.

ENTER:

Paul Kenny

Chief Clerk


Summaries of

People v. Sanford

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, Second Dept., 9th & 10th Judicial Districts
Feb 19, 2020
2020 N.Y. Slip Op. 63778 (N.Y. App. Term 2020)
Case details for

People v. Sanford

Case Details

Full title:The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Hugh Sanford…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Term, Second Dept., 9th & 10th Judicial Districts

Date published: Feb 19, 2020

Citations

2020 N.Y. Slip Op. 63778 (N.Y. App. Term 2020)