Opinion
December 14, 1987
Appeal from the Supreme Court, Kings County (Aiello, J.).
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
We agree with the hearing court's determination that the defendant was not induced to confess because of any promise made by the prosecutor. Therefore, the defendant's motion to suppress his confession was properly denied (see, People v Perry, 77 A.D.2d 269).
In view of the defendant's background and the heinousness of the crime, the sentence imposed was not an improper exercise of the court's discretion (see, People v Suitte, 90 A.D.2d 80 ). Mollen, P.J., Lawrence, Kunzeman and Harwood, JJ., concur.