From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Sanchez

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 29, 1995
222 A.D.2d 718 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)

Opinion

December 29, 1995

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Kings County (Goldstein, J.).


Ordered that the judgments are affirmed.

It was not improper for the police to put the defendant in a lineup even though they were aware that he was represented by counsel on an unrelated matter. Formal criminal proceedings against the defendant had not yet commenced and the defendant did not request the assistance of counsel at the lineup (see, People v Hernandez, 70 N.Y.2d 833; People v McKenzie, 180 A.D.2d 827; People v Bryant, 178 A.D.2d 420; cf., People v Coates, 74 N.Y.2d 244; People v LoPizzo, 173 A.D.2d 562).

The defendant's remaining contentions, including those raised in his pro se supplemental brief, were waived as a part of the negotiated plea bargain (see, People v Callahan, 80 N.Y.2d 273; People v Seaberg, 74 N.Y.2d 1). Rosenblatt, J.P., Copertino, Friedmann and Krausman, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Sanchez

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 29, 1995
222 A.D.2d 718 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)
Case details for

People v. Sanchez

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. EDDIE SANCHEZ…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Dec 29, 1995

Citations

222 A.D.2d 718 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)
636 N.Y.S.2d 67

Citing Cases

People v. Hinckson

The defendant was not denied his right to counsel at a lineup which occurred prior to the initiation of…