The People were entitled to introduce the victim's grand jury testimony and her trial testimony from a codefendant's trial, along with the corroborative hearing and trial testimony of defendant's then-underage girlfriend and defendant's own statements of remorse, to establish clear and convincing evidence that defendant ran a prostitution ring, threatened the victim with a gun to get her to work for him as a prostitute, and raped the victim on multiple occasions (see People v Sincerbeaux, 27 N.Y.3d 683, 688 [2016]; People v Sanchez, 192 A.D.3d 409, 410 [1st Dept 2021]; People v Epstein, 89 A.D.3d 570, 570-71 [1st Dept 2011]). Such evidence constituted "highly reliable proof" that outweighed any competing inferences to the contrary (Epstein, 89 A.D.3d at 570-71).