From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Samuels

Supreme Court of New York, Appellate Division, First Department
Jun 29, 2021
No. 2021-04107 (N.Y. App. Div. Jun. 29, 2021)

Opinion

2021-04107 Ind 2353/16 1768/18 2353/16 1768/18

06-29-2021

The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Carleton Samuels, Defendant-Appellant. Appeal No. 14142-14142A Case No. 2019-3850

Robert S. Dean, Center for Appellate Litigation, New York (Megan D. Byrne of counsel), for appellant. Darcel D. Clark, District Attorney, Bronx (Robert Myers of counsel), for respondent.


Robert S. Dean, Center for Appellate Litigation, New York (Megan D. Byrne of counsel), for appellant.

Darcel D. Clark, District Attorney, Bronx (Robert Myers of counsel), for respondent.

Before: Manzanet-Daniels, J.P., Kern, Mazzarelli, Shulman, JJ.

Judgments, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Margaret L. Clancy, J. at motions; Barry E. Warhit, J. at plea and sentencing), rendered March 20, 2019, convicting defendant of two counts of manslaughter in the first degree, and sentencing him to concurrent terms of 20 years, unanimously affirmed.

Defendant made a valid waiver of his right to appeal (see People v Thomas, 34 N.Y.3d 545 [2019], cert denied __ U.S. __, 140 S.Ct. 2634 [2020]; People v Bryant, 28 N.Y.3d 1094, 1096 [2016]). The plea court adequately described the right to appeal while separating it from the rights forfeited by a guilty plea. Even if the court required the waiver sua sponte, this Court "has not adopted the Second Department's requirement that the court articulate a reason for requiring an appeal waiver in a court-initiated plea proceeding" (People v Dilworth, 189 A.D.3d 636, 637 [1st Dept 2020], lv denied 36 N.Y.3d 1096 [2021]). Defendant's valid waiver forecloses review of the denial of his motion to controvert a search warrant and his excessive sentence claim.

Regardless of whether defendant made a valid appeal waiver, he did not preserve his claim that the motion court should have granted his motion to controvert the search warrant without ordering a hearing, and we decline to review it in the interest of justice. In any event, the court properly granted a hearing pursuant to Franks v Delaware (438 U.S. 154 [1978]), as defendant requested, whereupon defendant pleaded guilty rather than proceeding with the hearing. We also perceive no basis for reducing the sentence.


Summaries of

People v. Samuels

Supreme Court of New York, Appellate Division, First Department
Jun 29, 2021
No. 2021-04107 (N.Y. App. Div. Jun. 29, 2021)
Case details for

People v. Samuels

Case Details

Full title:The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Carleton Samuels…

Court:Supreme Court of New York, Appellate Division, First Department

Date published: Jun 29, 2021

Citations

No. 2021-04107 (N.Y. App. Div. Jun. 29, 2021)