From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Sampson

Michigan Court of Appeals
Aug 4, 1970
25 Mich. App. 696 (Mich. Ct. App. 1970)

Opinion

Docket No. 8,711.

Decided August 4, 1970.

Appeal from Recorder's Court of Detroit, George W. Crockett, Jr., J. Submitted Division 1 June 18, 1970, at Detroit. (Docket No. 8,711.) Decided August 4, 1970.

Lewis Sampson, Jr., was convicted, on his plea of guilty, of attempted breaking and entering of an occupied dwelling with intent to commit a felony or larceny. Defendant appeals. Affirmed.

Frank J. Kelley, Attorney General, Robert A. Derengoski, Solicitor General, William L. Cahalan, Prosecuting Attorney, Dominick R. Carnovale, Chief, Appellate Department, and Arthur N. Bishop, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for the people.

Michael J. Jaffe, for defendant on appeal.

Before: LESINSKI, C.J., and HOLBROOK and T.M. BURNS, JJ.


Defendant, as a result of his guilty plea, was convicted and sentenced for attempted breaking and entering of an occupied dwelling with intent to commit a felony or larceny under MCLA § 750.92 (Stat Ann 1962 Rev § 28.287). The trial court conducted an examination as required by statute (MCLA § 768.35 [Stat Ann 1954 Rev § 28.1058]) and court rule (GCR 1963, 785.3[2]), before it accepted his plea. Defendant now appeals, raising the following issue: whether the disclosure by defendant during the taking of the plea that he had been drinking immediately prior to the commission of the crime negated the specific intent required to establish the crime to which defendant pleaded guilty.

A review of defendant's brief and the transcript of the plea examination discloses that the question sought to be reviewed is unsubstantial and requires no argument or formal submission. Evidence that defendant had been drinking does not negate the existence of a specific intent in a guilty plea. People v. Paul (1968), 13 Mich. App. 175. The plea transcript reveals an extensive examination of the defendant as to the facts of the crime and defendant's participation in it. The transcript further shows that the defendant did by his plea affirm the existence of such intent.

This record does not disclose a miscarriage of justice. People v. Fred W. Thomas (1967), 7 Mich. App. 519.

Affirmed.


Summaries of

People v. Sampson

Michigan Court of Appeals
Aug 4, 1970
25 Mich. App. 696 (Mich. Ct. App. 1970)
Case details for

People v. Sampson

Case Details

Full title:PEOPLE v. SAMPSON

Court:Michigan Court of Appeals

Date published: Aug 4, 1970

Citations

25 Mich. App. 696 (Mich. Ct. App. 1970)
181 N.W.2d 615