From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Samper

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
May 13, 1997
239 A.D.2d 191 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)

Opinion

May 13, 1997

Supreme Court, New York County (Jay Gold, J.).


As a whole, the court's supplemental charges on evaluating witnesses' credibility adequately conveyed the proper standards ( People v. Fields, 87 N.Y.2d 821).

The court properly exercised its discretion when it denied defendant's motion for a mistrial since the court promptly struck the offending testimony and issued curative instructions to the jury ( People v. Owens, 214 A.D.2d 480, 481, lv denied 86 N.Y.2d 799). The court properly declined to discharge the purportedly deadlocked jury, which had deliberated over a 2-day period, during which it requested and obtained extensive readback and re-instruction ( Matter of Plummer v. Rothwax, 63 N.Y.2d 243).

Concur — Murphy, P.J., Rosenberger, Wallach, Tom and Andrias, JJ.


Summaries of

People v. Samper

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
May 13, 1997
239 A.D.2d 191 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)
Case details for

People v. Samper

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. CARLOS SAMPER…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: May 13, 1997

Citations

239 A.D.2d 191 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)
657 N.Y.S.2d 640

Citing Cases

People v. Larrea

In any event, this statement was properly received as an excited utterance, since it was clearly made under…

People v. Goode

The hearing evidence established that the voluntariness of defendant's statements to the police was not…