Opinion
November 18, 1985
Appeal from the Supreme Court, Queens County (Rotker, J.).
Judgment affirmed.
Defendant failed to preserve for appellate review the issue of the sufficiency of the plea allocution (see, People v Hoke, 62 N.Y.2d 1022; People v Pellegrino, 60 N.Y.2d 636; People v Gonzalez, 110 A.D.2d 909). Had defendant preserved this issue for review, the record demonstrates that defendant knowingly, voluntarily and intelligently pleaded guilty (see, People v Harris, 61 N.Y.2d 9; People v Mattocks, 100 A.D.2d 944). No facts have been presented in support of defendant's contention that the sentence imposed was unduly harsh or excessive. We further note that the sentence imposed was that which was promised when the plea was accepted (see, People v Kazepis, 101 A.D.2d 816). Mollen, P.J., Thompson, Brown and Lawrence, JJ., concur.