From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Salley

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Nov 17, 2009
67 A.D.3d 525 (N.Y. App. Div. 2009)

Opinion

Nos. 1491, 1492.

November 17, 2009.

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Maxwell Wiley, J.), entered on or about April 26, 2007, which adjudicated defendant a level three sex offender pursuant to the Sex Offender Registration Act (Correction Law art 6-C), unanimously affirmed, without costs. Judgment of resentence for the underlying conviction, same court (Daniel P. FitzGerald, J.), rendered on or about July 2, 2008, resentencing defendant to a term of three years with three years' postrelease supervision, unanimously affirmed.

Steven Banks, The Legal Aid Society, New York (Michael C. Taglieri of counsel), for appellant.

Robert M. Morgenthau, District Attorney, New York (David P. Stromes of counsel), for respondent.

Before: Gonzalez, P.J., Saxe, McGuire, Acosta and Roman, JJ.


The People met their burden of establishing, by clear and convincing evidence, risk factors bearing a sufficient total point score to support a level three sex offender adjudication. The court properly assessed 20 points for sexual misconduct while confined. Although the sexual activity was allegedly consensual and noncriminal, it warranted this assessment under the Sex Offender Registration Act: Risk Assessment Guidelines and Commentary because it violated prison disciplinary rules. Furthermore, defendant's inability to refrain from forbidden sexual conduct on the occasion at issue was relevant to his potential for sexual recidivism. The court also properly assessed 15 points for refusing sex offender treatment, and defendant's arguments to the contrary are without merit.


Summaries of

People v. Salley

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Nov 17, 2009
67 A.D.3d 525 (N.Y. App. Div. 2009)
Case details for

People v. Salley

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. RASHEEM SALLEY…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Nov 17, 2009

Citations

67 A.D.3d 525 (N.Y. App. Div. 2009)
2009 N.Y. Slip Op. 8465
889 N.Y.S.2d 143

Citing Cases

People v. Watson

The record shows that defendant's good behavior was accounted for under the RAI. Factors which otherwise…

People v. Perry

Defendant's argument that points should not be assessed for consensual sexual activity that would be lawful…