From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Salim

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 18, 1995
222 A.D.2d 621 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)

Opinion

December 18, 1995

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Kings County (Marrus, J.).


Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant's challenge to the legal sufficiency of the evidence is unpreserved for appellate review ( see, CPL 470.05; People v Udzinski, 146 A.D.2d 245). In any event, viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution ( see, People v Contes, 60 N.Y.2d 620), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish the defendant's guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. Moreover, upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the verdict of guilt was not against the weight of the evidence ( see, CPL 470.15).

The defendant has failed to preserve for appellate review his claim that he was not properly adjudicated a second felony offender ( see, People v Smith, 73 N.Y.2d 961; People v DeGroat, 203 A.D.2d 378). In any event, he waived this issue ( see, CPL 400.21; People v Hewitt, 97 A.D.2d 828; People v Quattrocchi, 121 A.D.2d 479). Mangano, P.J., Bracken, Sullivan and Hart, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Salim

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 18, 1995
222 A.D.2d 621 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)
Case details for

People v. Salim

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. NAIM SALIM, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Dec 18, 1995

Citations

222 A.D.2d 621 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)
636 N.Y.S.2d 647

Citing Cases

People v. Salim

March 24, 1997. Application by the appellant for a writ of error coram nobis to vacate, on the ground of…

People v. Alves

Contrary to the defendant's contention, his present argument challenging a prior conviction in the State of…