From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Salgado

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 30, 2001
282 A.D.2d 765 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)

Opinion

April 9, 2001.

April 30, 2001.

Lynn W. L. Fahey, New York, N.Y., for appellant.

Richard A. Brown, District Attorney, Kew Gardens, N.Y. (John M. Castellano, Lisa Drury, and Cindy Jo of counsel), for respondent.

Before: FRED T. SANTUCCI, J.P., SONDRA MILLER, DANIEL F. LUCIANO, SANDRA J. FEUERSTEIN, THOMAS A. ADAMS, JJ.


DECISION ORDER

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Rotker, J.), rendered July 26, 1999, convicting him of assault in the first degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

ORDERED that the judgment is reversed, on the law, and the matter is remitted to the Supreme Court, Queens County, for further proceedings consistent herewith.

As the People concede, since the Supreme Court was unable to fulfill its sentence promise, the matter should be remitted to the Supreme Court to afford the defendant the opportunity to withdraw his plea of guilty (see, People v. Selikoff, 35 N.Y.2d 227, 241; cert denied 419 U.S. 1122; People v. Smith, 246 A.D.2d 562).

The defendant's remaining contention is without merit.


Summaries of

People v. Salgado

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 30, 2001
282 A.D.2d 765 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)
Case details for

People v. Salgado

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE, ETC., respondent, v. VICTOR SALGADO, appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Apr 30, 2001

Citations

282 A.D.2d 765 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)
724 N.Y.S.2d 349

Citing Cases

People v. Picca

Where the promise of adequate drug treatment is unfulfilled, the plea induced by that promise “ ‘either must…