From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Salamino

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jan 28, 1985
107 A.D.2d 827 (N.Y. App. Div. 1985)

Opinion

January 28, 1985

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Queens County (Beerman, J.).


Order reversed, on the law and the facts, motion denied, and matter remitted to the Supreme Court, Queens County, for further proceedings.

We find the evidence at the suppression hearing conclusively established that Police Officer Gambino, while lawfully on the premises of C J Auto Body, properly viewed the tampered vehicle identification number plate on the dashboard of the vehicle which was claimed to be owned by defendant and which was the subject of the charges against him. Inasmuch as the tampered VIN plate was in open view and the Cadillac was at the entranceway to the premises, such observation "involv[ed] no Fourth Amendment search" ( Texas v. Brown, 460 U.S. 730, 738, n 4; People v. Class, 63 N.Y.2d 491; People v. Ciardullo, 74 A.D.2d 580).

Accordingly, defendant's suppression motion should have been denied. Titone, J.P., Mangano, Gibbons and O'Connor, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Salamino

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jan 28, 1985
107 A.D.2d 827 (N.Y. App. Div. 1985)
Case details for

People v. Salamino

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Appellant, v. FRANK SALAMINO…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jan 28, 1985

Citations

107 A.D.2d 827 (N.Y. App. Div. 1985)

Citing Cases

People v. Ost

It is clear from the record that the vehicle was not in an area readily accessible to the public, nor in open…

People v. Malatesta

[Harlan, J., concurring]; People v Farenga, 42 NY2d 1092, 1093; People v Doerbecker, 39 NY2d 448, 452; see…