Opinion
June 4, 1998
Appeal from the Supreme Court, New York County (John Bradley, J.).
The verdict was based on legally sufficient evidence and was not against the weight of the evidence. There was ample evidence that defendant's unlawful entry into an office building was coupled with a contemporaneous intent to commit a crime therein, including evidence that he was on upper floors late at night while offices were deserted and secured, that he entered surreptitiously, fled when he saw security personnel and evaded detection, and that he first lied about being an employee and then made the dubious claim that he was present to use the bathroom ( see, People v. Castillo, 47 N.Y.2d 270, 277-278; People v. Gilligan, 42 N.Y.2d 969; People v. Jenkins, 213 A.D.2d 279, lv denied 85 N.Y.2d 974). Defendant's objections to the People's summation in this nonjury trial are without merit.
Concur — Milonas, J. P., Wallach, Tom, Mazzarelli and Saxe, JJ.