From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Sain

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 10, 1999
261 A.D.2d 488 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)

Opinion

May 10, 1999

Appeal from the County Court, Westchester County (Ryan, J.).


Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The determination as to whether to allow a defendant to withdraw a previously-entered plea of guilty rests within the sound discretion of the sentencing court. Only in rare instances will a defendant be entitled to an evidentiary hearing upon a motion to withdraw a plea of guilty ( see, CPL 220.60; People v. Frederick, 45 N.Y.2d 520, 524; People v. Tinsley, 35 N.Y.2d 926, 927; People v. Santana, 176 A.D.2d 360). The County Court did not improvidently exercise its discretion in denying the defendant's motion to withdraw his plea without conducting a hearing.

The defendant's contention that the indictment was jurisdictionally defective because the Grand Jury which heard the case voted an indictment after its term had expired is based on matters which are dehors the record.

Mangano, P. J., Santucci, Krausman, Florio and H. Miller, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Sain

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 10, 1999
261 A.D.2d 488 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)
Case details for

People v. Sain

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent v. JOSEPH SAIN, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: May 10, 1999

Citations

261 A.D.2d 488 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)
691 N.Y.S.2d 64

Citing Cases

People v. Smith

The defendant did not complete the required MICA program, and the court sentenced him to concurrent…

People v. Yurkovsky

Upon the foregoing, the within motion would normally be summarily denied. CPL § 220.60(3): People v Hansen,…