From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Saft

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Dec 7, 1967
29 A.D.2d 618 (N.Y. App. Div. 1967)

Opinion

December 7, 1967

Appeal from the Erie County Court.

Present — Bastow, J.P., Goldman, Henry, Del Vecchio and Marsh, JJ.


Order unanimously modified in accordance with the Memorandum and, as modified, affirmed. Memorandum: The conspiracy counts of the indictments are sufficient. The allegations thereof, including those appearing under the headings "Overt Acts" sufficiently set forth the essential elements of the respective crimes charged. (Code Crim. Pro., § 285; People v. Willis, 158 N.Y. 392, 397; People v. Farson, 244 N.Y. 413; People v. Scobie, 257 App. Div. 854, affd. 281 N.Y. 796.) The order should, therefore, be modified by striking from the first ordering paragraph thereof the words "First" and by providing that the demurrers to the counts designated "First" be disallowed.


Summaries of

People v. Saft

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Dec 7, 1967
29 A.D.2d 618 (N.Y. App. Div. 1967)
Case details for

People v. Saft

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Appellant, v. RALPH SAFT, Respondent…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Dec 7, 1967

Citations

29 A.D.2d 618 (N.Y. App. Div. 1967)

Citing Cases

People v. Givens

The evidence was sufficient to warrant the inference that defendant was part of a common effort to sell…

People v. Fiedler

( People v. Jacoby, 304 N.Y. 33, cert. den. 344 U.S. 864.) It is legally sufficient if it informs the…