Opinion
Submitted March 23, 1964
Decided April 2, 1964
Motion to amend remittitur granted. Return of remittitur requested and, when returned, it will be amended by adding thereto the following: Upon the appeal herein there was presented and necessarily passed upon a question under the Constitution of the United States, viz.: Defendant contended that because of the unreasonable delay in prosecuting the charge pending against him he was denied the right to a speedy hearing and trial and to due process of law guaranteed by the Sixth and Fourteenth Amendments to the Constitution of the United States. The Court of Appeals held that defendant's constitutional rights were not violated.