From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Saalfield

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jul 10, 1964
200 N.E.2d 862 (N.Y. 1964)

Opinion

Argued June 2, 1964

Decided July 10, 1964

Appeal from the Erie County Court, ROGER E. PYLE, Acting P.J.

Frank P. Della Posta for appellant.

Michael F. Dillon, District Attorney ( Arthur G. Baumeister and Theodore S. Kasler of counsel), for respondent.


Judgment reversed and a new trial ordered in the following memorandum: The Justice of the Peace is required, during the course of a trial before him, to keep some record thereof, no matter how informal, so as to insure a proper review on appeal ( People v. Giles, 152 N.Y. 136, 140; People v. Wilkins, 281 N.Y. 224, 225). This is especially so in a case such as the one at bar, wherein the defendant made a specific request that a record of the proceedings be kept.

Concur: Chief Judge DESMOND and Judges DYE, FULD, VAN VOORHIS, BURKE, SCILEPPI and BERGAN.


Summaries of

People v. Saalfield

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jul 10, 1964
200 N.E.2d 862 (N.Y. 1964)
Case details for

People v. Saalfield

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. JOHN H. SAALFIELD…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Jul 10, 1964

Citations

200 N.E.2d 862 (N.Y. 1964)
200 N.E.2d 862
252 N.Y.S.2d 320

Citing Cases

People v. Sherman

In brief, the record presented is not of such a nature that a determination of "the facts may be reviewed…

People v. Ruggerio

Under the circumstances of this case, the County Court lacked the power, as a matter of law, to dismiss the…