From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Rutledge

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Nov 14, 2017
63 N.Y.S.3d 673 (N.Y. App. Div. 2017)

Opinion

11-14-2017

The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Michael RUTLEDGE, Defendant–Appellant.

Robert S. Dean, Center for Appellate Litigation, New York (Jody Ratner of Counsel), for appellant. Cyrus R. Vance, Jr., District Attorney, New York (Hope Korenstein of Counsel), for respondent.


Robert S. Dean, Center for Appellate Litigation, New York (Jody Ratner of Counsel), for appellant.

Cyrus R. Vance, Jr., District Attorney, New York (Hope Korenstein of Counsel), for respondent.

An appeal having been taken to this Court by the above-named appellant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, New York County (Neil Ross, J.), rendered May 3, 2016,

Said appeal having been argued by counsel for the respective parties, due deliberation having been had thereon, and finding the sentence not excessive,

It is unanimously ordered that the judgment so appealed from be and the same is hereby affirmed.

RICHTER, J.P., MAZZARELLI, KAHN, MOULTON, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Rutledge

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Nov 14, 2017
63 N.Y.S.3d 673 (N.Y. App. Div. 2017)
Case details for

People v. Rutledge

Case Details

Full title:The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Michael RUTLEDGE…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.

Date published: Nov 14, 2017

Citations

63 N.Y.S.3d 673 (N.Y. App. Div. 2017)