From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Russell

Michigan Court of Appeals
Jul 30, 1971
35 Mich. App. 418 (Mich. Ct. App. 1971)

Opinion

Docket No. 10024.

Decided July 30, 1971.

Frank J. Kelley, Attorney General, Robert A. Derengoski, Solicitor General, William L. Cahalan, Prosecuting Attorney, Dominick R. Carnovale, Chief, Appellate Department, and Arthur N. Bishop, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for the people.

Armand D. Bove, for defendant on appeal.

Before: T.M. BURNS, P.J., and FITZGERALD and HOLBROOK, JJ.


The defendant was charged with possession of heroin. MCLA § 335.153 (Stat Ann 1957 Rev § 18.1123). He pled guilty to attempted possession of heroin. MCLA § 750.92 (Stat Ann 1962 Rev § 28.287). He was sentenced to a term of 1-1/2 to 5 years with a recommendation that he be referred to the Narcotic Rehabilitation Program. There was no motion for a new trial.

On appeal the defendant claims that the trial court did not elicit a substantial factual basis for the plea. We have reviewed the record and find the defendant's argument to be without merit. There was a substantial factual basis for the plea. People v. Allen (1971), 31 Mich. App. 183. Any question of the voluntariness of the plea not supported by the record must be first addressed to the trial court. People v. Horvath (1970), 25 Mich. App. 649. It is manifest that the question sought to be reviewed is so unsubstantial that no argument or formal submission is needed.

Affirmed.


Summaries of

People v. Russell

Michigan Court of Appeals
Jul 30, 1971
35 Mich. App. 418 (Mich. Ct. App. 1971)
Case details for

People v. Russell

Case Details

Full title:PEOPLE v. RUSSELL

Court:Michigan Court of Appeals

Date published: Jul 30, 1971

Citations

35 Mich. App. 418 (Mich. Ct. App. 1971)
192 N.W.2d 593