From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Rudenko

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Mar 28, 2018
159 A.D.3d 985 (N.Y. App. Div. 2018)

Opinion

2014–05499 Ind. 5272/12

03-28-2018

The PEOPLE, etc., respondent, v. Konstantin RUDENKO, appellant.

Konstantin Rudenko, Coxsackie, NY, appellant pro se. Eric Gonzalez, District Attorney, Brooklyn, N.Y. (Leonard Joblove, Solomon Neubort, and Arieh Schulman of counsel), for respondent. Paul Skip Laisure, New York, N.Y. (Nao Terai of counsel), former appellate counsel.


Konstantin Rudenko, Coxsackie, NY, appellant pro se.

Eric Gonzalez, District Attorney, Brooklyn, N.Y. (Leonard Joblove, Solomon Neubort, and Arieh Schulman of counsel), for respondent.

Paul Skip Laisure, New York, N.Y. (Nao Terai of counsel), former appellate counsel.

WILLIAM F. MASTRO, J.P., REINALDO E. RIVERA, SHERI S. ROMAN, SANDRA L. SGROI, JJ.

DECISION & ORDER

Application by the appellant for a writ of error coram nobis to vacate, on the ground of ineffective assistance of appellate counsel, a decision and order of this Court dated June 28, 2017 ( People v. Rudenko, 151 A.D.3d 1084, 54 N.Y.S.3d 597 ), affirming a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, rendered May 15, 2014.

ORDERED that the application is denied.

The appellant has failed to establish that he was denied the effective assistance of appellate counsel (see Jones v. Barnes, 463 U.S. 745, 103 S.Ct. 3308, 77 L.Ed.2d 987 ; People v. Stultz, 2 N.Y.3d 277, 778 N.Y.S.2d 431, 810 N.E.2d 883 ).

MASTRO, J.P., RIVERA, ROMAN and SGROI, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Rudenko

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Mar 28, 2018
159 A.D.3d 985 (N.Y. App. Div. 2018)
Case details for

People v. Rudenko

Case Details

Full title:The PEOPLE, etc., respondent, v. Konstantin RUDENKO, appellant.

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.

Date published: Mar 28, 2018

Citations

159 A.D.3d 985 (N.Y. App. Div. 2018)
70 N.Y.S.3d 862