From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Rossborough

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Nov 15, 2012
100 A.D.3d 1149 (N.Y. App. Div. 2012)

Opinion

2012-11-15

The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Ronald D. ROSSBOROUGH, Appellant.

Donna C. Chin, Ithaca, for appellant. Weeden A. Wetmore, District Attorney, Elmira (Susan Rider–Ulacco of counsel), for respondent.


Donna C. Chin, Ithaca, for appellant. Weeden A. Wetmore, District Attorney, Elmira (Susan Rider–Ulacco of counsel), for respondent.
Before: MERCURE, J.P., LAHTINEN, KAVANAGH, McCARTHY and GARRY, JJ.

GARRY, J.

Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Chemung County (Hayden, J.), rendered September 23, 2010, convicting *905defendant upon his plea of guilty of the crime of forgery in the second degree.

In satisfaction of a four-count indictment, defendant pleaded guilty to one count of forgery in the second degree and agreed to pay restitution. County Court sentenced defendant to an agreed-upon prison term of 2 to 4 years, and further ordered him to pay $3,467.50 in restitution. Defendant contends upon this appeal that County Court was obliged to conduct a restitution hearing, but he expressed satisfaction with the factual basis for the amount ordered and agreed to proceed to sentencing without a restitution hearing. His argument is thus unpreserved for our review, and we perceive no reason to take corrective action in the interest of justice ( see People v. Horne, 97 N.Y.2d 404, 414 n. 3, 740 N.Y.S.2d 675, 767 N.E.2d 132 [2002];People v. Klages, 90 A.D.3d 1149, 1151, 934 N.Y.S.2d 259 [2011],lv. denied18 N.Y.3d 925, 942 N.Y.S.2d 464, 965 N.E.2d 966 [2012];People v. Naumowicz, 76 A.D.3d 747, 748, 907 N.Y.S.2d 353 [2010] ).

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.

MERCURE, J.P., LAHTINEN, KAVANAGH and McCARTHY, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Rossborough

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Nov 15, 2012
100 A.D.3d 1149 (N.Y. App. Div. 2012)
Case details for

People v. Rossborough

Case Details

Full title:The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Ronald D. ROSSBOROUGH…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.

Date published: Nov 15, 2012

Citations

100 A.D.3d 1149 (N.Y. App. Div. 2012)
2012 N.Y. Slip Op. 7715
953 N.Y.S.2d 904

Citing Cases

People v. Woods

County Court should have conducted a restitution hearing (see People v. Thomas, 71 A.D.3d 1231, 1232, 896…

People v. Woods

Although the appeal waiver does not preclude defendant's assertion that County Court should have conducted a…