From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Ross

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 8, 2004
12 A.D.3d 463 (N.Y. App. Div. 2004)

Opinion

2003-04303.

November 8, 2004.

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Kron, J.), rendered April 29, 2003, convicting him of robbery in the second degree (two counts), assault in the second degree (two counts), and assault in the third degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Before: Florio, J.P., Krausman, Cozier and Rivera, JJ., concur.


Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Contrary to the defendant's contention, the statements made by a certain prospective juror "did not rise to the level of actual bias or otherwise indicate that [he] would be unable to render an impartial verdict" ( People v. Archer, 210 AD2d 241). Accordingly, since no actual bias was evinced, there was no need for the Supreme Court to administer an expurgatory oath or sustain the defendant's challenge for cause ( see People v. Hernandez, 222 AD2d 696; CPL 270.20 [b]).


Summaries of

People v. Ross

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 8, 2004
12 A.D.3d 463 (N.Y. App. Div. 2004)
Case details for

People v. Ross

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. CALVIN ROSS, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Nov 8, 2004

Citations

12 A.D.3d 463 (N.Y. App. Div. 2004)
783 N.Y.S.2d 845

Citing Cases

People v. Glover

The trial court providently exercised its discretion in denying the defendant's challenges for cause to two…

People v. Wright

The statements made by the three prospective jurors did not rise to the level of actual bias or otherwise…