From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Ross

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Jun 1, 1995
216 A.D.2d 605 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)

Opinion

June 1, 1995

Appeal from the County Court of Chemung County (Danaher, Jr., J.).


In an effort to overturn his conviction, defendant claims, inter alia, that he was denied the effective assistance of counsel by his attorney's failure to serve a written motion to withdraw his guilty plea and that his guilty plea was not knowing and voluntary because he was distraught by his sister's death at the time he entered into the plea agreement. Our review of the record, however, reveals that defendant indicated to County Court that he was satisfied with his attorney's services and that he did not wish to withdraw his guilty plea. We further find that defendant fully understood the ramifications of the plea agreement and that, therefore, his plea was knowingly and voluntarily made. We have examined defendant's remaining contentions and find them to be without merit.

Mikoll, J.P., Crew III, Yesawich Jr., Peters and Spain, JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.


Summaries of

People v. Ross

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Jun 1, 1995
216 A.D.2d 605 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)
Case details for

People v. Ross

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. DANIEL ROSS, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Jun 1, 1995

Citations

216 A.D.2d 605 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)
627 N.Y.S.2d 583

Citing Cases

People v. Baker

On this appeal, defendant contends that County Court erred in denying his motion to withdraw his guilty plea…